sassy-spoon:

When friend is clearly upset but they don’t wanna talk about it but you wanna help but don’t know how and you just kinda

image

(via puresodanium)

ask-hazy:

Alien: Isolation looks badass.

ask-hazy:

Alien: Isolation looks badass.

(via femship4)

2d-dream:

takashi0:

walressia-rp:

yuki-menoko:

gloomandhowitgetsthatway:

k17l53:

sugar-soul:



Thanks satan.

What the fuck man

This post goes around on this site and everytime I see it, as a Theologist in making it annoys me to see these “militiant atheists” (or fedoraists, to seperate the good ones from the bad ones, cause I love you guys) who tries to falsely accuse the Holy Scriptures with things that are never said in either of the scriptures. "That women are to be sold if they were raped" in the Bible or "That women must sexually submit to men" in the Qu’ran. Ofcourse, I’m not trying to prove Satanism wrong, I don’t really care what people believe in, but I’m here to correct the misinterpretations by Tumblr’s gullible community as a way to educate, because it might actually interest you to know some real facts about what the Abrahamic religions says on the matter:
First of all - YOU ALL KNOW THAT ADULTERY IS PROHIBITED IN EITHER SCRIPTURES, YET YOU TRY TO TURN THOSE VERSES UPSIDE DOWN FOR YOUR OWN PLEASURE. [17:32, 25:68-70, Quran] [Exodus 20:14 Proverbs 6:32 Hebrew 13:4]
Second - There are no verses that said so, never has that been said.
Third - Noone sells women when they’ve been violated, who even does that today?
Fourth - Do you guys actually read the scriptures AT ALL???
Fifth - There’s one verse in Deuteronomy that claims that a Man should marry and stay with the woman if she’d been violated by him and pay her 50 shekels. [Deuteronomy 22:29]1. Christians do not follow the Torah/Old Testament anymore, they follow the New Testament. It’s called the New Covenant, and Jesus never claimed anything about selling women in the Gospels.2. The rapist is required to marry his victim, and is not permitted to divorce her without her consent. The Talmud explains that this obligation rests on the rapist,  NOT THE VICTIM. She is under no obligation to marry him.  ”He must pay fifty shekels to compensate her for the lack of gifts, and is also forced to marry her, should she desire it” says Bible commentator and philosopher Rabbi Isaac Abarbanel, so you won’t bash Judaism for that either.[Talmud, Ketubot 49b]
Fifth - FOR THE LAST TIME, USE SOURCES FOR THE VERSES THAT SAYS SO
Sixth - Rape is strictly forbidden in either scriptures and can result in a mild case of THE DEADNESS - not only is it Adultery, but in Islam, Christianity as well as Judaism it’s an act of terror against an individual and society.
That post has over 100,000 notes, can you believe that at least 50,000 people on this Shaytaan website fell for it and assumes that we all condone such acts? 

Wow really people are trying to push this stuff off as fact when it’s not?

Yes.
Because Anti-theists are just as stupid and gullible as the people they claim to hate.

Thank you, yuki-menoko.  Thank you.

2d-dream:

takashi0:

walressia-rp:

yuki-menoko:

gloomandhowitgetsthatway:

k17l53:

sugar-soul:

image

Thanks satan.

What the fuck man

This post goes around on this site and everytime I see it, as a Theologist in making it annoys me to see these “militiant atheists” (or fedoraists, to seperate the good ones from the bad ones, cause I love you guys) who tries to falsely accuse the Holy Scriptures with things that are never said in either of the scriptures. "That women are to be sold if they were raped" in the Bible or "That women must sexually submit to men" in the Qu’ran. Ofcourse, I’m not trying to prove Satanism wrong, I don’t really care what people believe in, but I’m here to correct the misinterpretations by Tumblr’s gullible community as a way to educate, because it might actually interest you to know some real facts about what the Abrahamic religions says on the matter:

  • First of all - YOU ALL KNOW THAT ADULTERY IS PROHIBITED IN EITHER SCRIPTURES, YET YOU TRY TO TURN THOSE VERSES UPSIDE DOWN FOR YOUR OWN PLEASURE. 
    [17:32, 25:68-70, Quran] 
    [Exodus 20:14 Proverbs 6:32 Hebrew 13:4]

  • Second - There are no verses that said so, never has that been said.

  • Third - Noone sells women when they’ve been violated, who even does that today?

  • Fourth - Do you guys actually read the scriptures AT ALL???

  • Fifth - There’s one verse in Deuteronomy that claims that a Man should marry and stay with the woman if she’d been violated by him and pay her 50 shekels. [Deuteronomy 22:29]
    1. Christians do not follow the Torah/Old Testament anymore, they follow the New Testament. It’s called the New Covenant, and Jesus never claimed anything about selling women in the Gospels.
    2. The rapist is required to marry his victim, and is not permitted to divorce her without her consent. The Talmud explains that this obligation rests on the rapist,  NOT THE VICTIM. She is under no obligation to marry him.  ”He must pay fifty shekels to compensate her for the lack of gifts, and is also forced to marry her, should she desire it” says Bible commentator and philosopher Rabbi Isaac Abarbanel, so you won’t bash Judaism for that either.
    [Talmud, Ketubot 49b]
  • Fifth - FOR THE LAST TIME, USE SOURCES FOR THE VERSES THAT SAYS SO

  • Sixth - Rape is strictly forbidden in either scriptures and can result in a mild case of THE DEADNESS - not only is it Adultery, but in Islam, Christianity as well as Judaism it’s an act of terror against an individual and society.

That post has over 100,000 notes, can you believe that at least 50,000 people on this Shaytaan website fell for it and assumes that we all condone such acts? 

Wow really people are trying to push this stuff off as fact when it’s not?

Yes.

Because Anti-theists are just as stupid and gullible as the people they claim to hate.

Thank you, yuki-menoko.  Thank you.

sleepcycled:

THIS IS SO RAW

sleepcycled:

THIS IS SO RAW

(via mysticandmagicmoon)

f1dot8:

Humble places, fig.2 
ISO 100, f6.3 @ 35mm, 30sec., 22:46  © Markus Lehr, 2014, book I prints I website

f1dot8:

Humble places, fig.2 

ISO 100, f6.3 @ 35mm, 30sec., 22:46 
© Markus Lehr, 2014, book I prints I website

boiler3:

Finished! co-lab between myself and Sweetcream. Bronycon, prepare yourself.

boiler3:

Finished! co-lab between myself and Sweetcream. Bronycon, prepare yourself.

(via sturmtruppen)

naamah-beherit:

avengerwho:

tastefullyoffensive:

Grandma caterpillar putting on lipstick. [via]

took me a minute

yeah, but when it does, you can’t unsee it

naamah-beherit:

avengerwho:

tastefullyoffensive:

Grandma caterpillar putting on lipstick. [via]

took me a minute

yeah, but when it does, you can’t unsee it

(via that-mouthy-christian)

neoshadownight:

elsarendelle:

IVE BEEN LAUGHING AT THIS FOR ABOUT 10 YEARS

BEEN LAUGHING SINCE THE RENAISSANCE

neoshadownight:

elsarendelle:

IVE BEEN LAUGHING AT THIS FOR ABOUT 10 YEARS

BEEN LAUGHING SINCE THE RENAISSANCE

(via david-10inch)

aspiringskeletonlord:

reaching that mental crisis when the Great Skeleton War is raging on and you don’t know what you’re fighting for

image

when you remember you get to keep the souls you collect

image

(via equestrianrepublican)